The US government applied to the Supreme Court to allow trump to shield black powder

U.S. President trump was accused of violating the Constitution by hacking his account on social media twitter. According to US media reports, the trump Administration recently asked the United States Supreme Court to allow trump raher < / P > < p > integrated American Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Capitol Hill News reported that Trump’s social media account was his personal property on Thursday (20 local time). Jeffrey wall, acting Attorney General of the U.S. Department of justice, said that “the president’s authority to use Twitter’s personal account functions, including blocking functions, is independent of the president’s office.”. In a filing with the Supreme Court, lawyers for the U.S. Department of justice urged prosecutors to overturn earlier rulings against trump made by the lower court of appeal. The court of Appeal ruled last year (2019) that Trump’s blocking of Twitter users based on political views was unconstitutional. The U.S. Department of Justice said Trump’s social media posts were private, not government. < / P > < p > in July 2017, the knight First Amendment Institute of Columbia University filed a lawsuit in the court on behalf of seven individuals whose twitter accounts were blocked by trump, suing trump to block those who criticized him on twitter. The plaintiff believes that according to the first amendment to the constitution, Trump’s Twitter account is actually a “public forum”, which blocks criticism and violates the relevant provisions of the first amendment of the constitution. “The Supreme Court should reject the White House petition and retain the prudent and reasonable decision of the court of appeal,” said James Jaffer, executive director of the knight Institute (overseas website Zhang Min)