No complaints about product failure after consumption? Their legitimate rights and interests are infringed, but there is no way to complain? Black cat complaint platform for you 24 hours, worry free consumption in black cat! According to the morning news of Sina Technology on August 19, Tesla responded to Sina Technology in response to the fact that Wuhan car owners successfully picked up their cars. The news that Wuhan car owners successfully picked up their cars last night showed the delivery process of car owners picking up their cars in pictures and texts. After that, the owner discussed with Tesla delivery personnel in the hotel about the re purchase of cars. According to the exclusive information of sina technology, the vehicles successfully delivered in Wuhan last night were orders placed in Changsha on July 28. A person responsible for the delivery of Tesla told Sina technology that the order rejected on August 13 is still in the state of cancellation, and there is no new order under the owner’s name. < / P > < p > Tesla said the owner had not been hacked by the authorities. The owner’s statement in an interview with the media in the early morning of August 19 that he could not buy because his name was blackened was inconsistent with the facts. < / P > < p > in addition, Tesla stressed that in the so-called “Wuhan vehicle owner delivery” report, the trailer used, the signature documents and the delivery operation process did not conform to the Tesla delivery specification and were not the normal process of Tesla. We strongly resent the practice of maliciously misleading public opinion by making news through self directing and self acting, and advise relevant parties to abide by the basic business ethics bottom line and stop playing with public opinion and consumer sentiment for their own interests. < / P > < p > at 8-9 p.m. on August 18, a large number of reports appeared on the Internet entitled “it’s appropriate to buy a car and pinduoduo to help Wuhan car owners successfully collect their cars”. The reports show the delivery process of the car owners in the form of pictures and pictures. At the same time, the owner of the car had already finished “picking up the car” and “taking photos”, and pretended to discuss with the delivery colleagues of our company on how to buy the car again as soon as possible. < / P > < p > at 1:00 a.m. on August 19, the owner suddenly accepted a media interview late at night and changed his name to pick up the car. He ordered the car in the name of his family, because his name was blackened and he could not buy it. According to the delivery data, the vehicle was ordered on the official website on July 28, while our company cancelled the order of Wuhan car owner on August 14, which is inconsistent with the statement that the owner of the vehicle ordered in the name of his family because of being blackmailed. < / P > < p > 4. In the report of so-called “Wuhan vehicle owner delivery”, the trailer, signature documents and delivery operation process used in the report do not conform to Tesla delivery specification, which is not the normal process of Tesla. We strongly resent the practice of maliciously misleading public opinion by making news through self directing and self acting, and advise relevant parties to abide by the basic business ethics bottom line and stop playing with public opinion and consumer sentiment for their own interests.