On gofun bar, there are many posts about purchasing energy block (GFC). “On the one hand, it is used to gamble (guess the rise and fall), on the other hand, it is sometimes used to exchange goods, such as car coupons.” A Baidu Post Bar in the acquisition of energy block users said so. < p > < p > < p > according to the guide of the first energy block ranking in gofun travel mobile phone application software (APP), the reporter of China business daily joined the wechat group named “gofun travel energy block 1 group”. After joining the wechat group named “gofun travel energy block 1 group”, the reporter found that there were more than 200 users trading energy blocks, and the group announcement was a link to the registration network of a virtual currency trading platform. What is the relationship between car sharing and blockchain? Why are users keen on buying and selling energy blocks? It is worth noting that after the reporter contacted gofun travel for an interview, the relevant articles on gofun travel block chain layout mentioned in the interview letter were deleted immediately. According to the official WeChat official account of GoFun travel,
uses block chain technology to increase the function of “using the car to mine”, and becomes the first platform in the industry to combine the automobile and the block chain in GoFun. However, the reporter has noticed that the car sharing chain (CSC) has announced that it is the first domestic blockchain project in the field of shared car travel. Our newspaper has previously reported that the incentive token of car sharing chain will be launched on the virtual currency trading platform. < / P > < p > in addition, a white paper on shared Car + blockchain platform released by gofun travel blockchain platform in the same year also issued blockchain reward coins. It is said that “the total amount of money is limited, and users can earn rewards by driving or by mining. The earlier you join, the higher the returns. ” < p > < p > similarly, gofun travel also means that the total amount of energy blocks is limited. When users complete the corresponding tasks, they can generate a corresponding number of energy blocks, which become the digital assets of users on the platform, and realize “mining by car”. And early participation has more advantages. According to Tianyan survey, gofun is mainly operated by Beijing Shouqi Zhixing Technology Co., Ltd., which is a time-sharing rental platform for new energy vehicles. The top three shareholders are Beijing Shouqi (Group) Co., Ltd., Beijing Capital Tourism Group Co., Ltd., and Volkswagen (China) Investment Co., Ltd., holding 28.85%, 27.44% and 20% respectively. < / P > < p > gofun travel app shows that users can use the blockchain wallet to make GFC transfers or receive GFC from friends. < / P > < p > “cashing is king’s road, just like bitcoin itself is a string of code, depending on what value the market gives it.” In the group, the reporter saw that the price of each GFC fluctuated between 0.1 yuan and 0.15 yuan. In gofun travel’s official app, 15 GFCs can be exchanged for 3 yuan voucher, that is to say, one GFC can be used as 0.2 yuan cash voucher. < / P > < p > however, it is obvious that users who buy and sell GFC are more interested in cashing points than in using points to consume in gofun ecology. The leader of the group is gofun’s number one energy cube holder. He changes the user’s name to his own micro signal to attract users to participate in the trading of GFC. Tan Yi, CEO of gofun shared car, once said publicly, “now its value (energy block GFC) is the same as that of point mall. But in the future, it is possible to turn it into a currency, into 10 million yuan, into 100 million yuan, I don’t know, because we have no issuance system so far, we have to see the policies of the regulatory authorities come out. ” The above group leader also quoted this paragraph of Tan Yi and added the text to indicate that “people in the circle must understand the ‘energy Cube’ in seconds. Isn’t this a token? Tan Yi left a paragraph for people to understand. ” < / P > < p > according to the official introduction of gofun travel, energy block is a reward based on individual gofun travel activities relying on blockchain technology. When users open the app daily to complete tasks such as daily check-in, invite friends, improve identity information, and use the car every day, they can obtain extraction power and capture more energy blocks. The total amount of energy blocks is limited, and the output is reduced by half every two years. < / P > < p > as we all know, the total amount of bitcoin is also limited, and the output will be halved after a fixed period of time. This is the way that bitcoin designers maintain the circulation and adoption of bitcoin to achieve value-added. < / P > < p > it is worth noting that at present, China’s regulatory authorities are still wary of virtual currencies such as bitcoin (etc), Ethereum (ETH). In September 2017, the people’s Bank of China and other seven ministries and commissions issued the “notice on preventing the financing risk of token issuance”, which clearly identified ICO (initial token financing) as illegal financing behavior, and comprehensively withdrew domestic financing token and virtual currency transaction business. < p > < p > SVP she Qiao, then gofun’s travel product technology research and development center, publicly stated that gfchain, gofun’s blockchain platform, was an alliance chain based on Ethereum. So, what is the difference between energy block GFC and Ethereum, bitcoin and other virtual currencies? What are the advantages compared with traditional integral? However, she did not send a reply to tan Yiqiao after receiving the above-mentioned letter. < / P > < p > integral is the product of the Internet, which plays the role of a link between b-end (enterprise) and C-end (user) in the business world. Generally, b-end businesses use the points to benchmark their own ecological rights and interests to maintain the stickiness and loyalty of users. < / P > < p > and the issuance of blockchain integral is based on the underlying technology of blockchain, which supports the operation of token economic system with technology without centralized management organization. The consensus in the industry is that bitcoin has been running for ten years without centralized supervision and management, which is a successful example of blockchain token. However, Yuan Shang, a researcher at the inter chain pulse Research Institute, points out that the product designers of blockchain products are too casual in defining the amount of labor in the design of the token (integral) model. First of all, consumer behavior can not be regarded as labor. Many so-called blockchain products regard the consumer behavior of users as labor, such as reading articles and purchasing goods. The price of blockchain products to encourage these consumer behaviors is that their own token is worthless. Secondly, the unilateral labor contribution of users to the product side is of no value in the market. Some products call on users to pull heads for their products, and then give pass incentives. However, if the product side does not need to buy back these warrants, the value of the passes will return to zero. Finally, digestion in the system, the energy of general syndrome will be lower and lower. < / P > < p > on the level of value transmission provided by blockchain for value Internet, the Research Report of Guoxin Securities overseas group also pointed out that the main role of the Internet is to make information flow on the Internet, and the information is transmitted in the form of replication (copy a to b). The “account book” constructed by blockchain is characterized by openness, transparency, non tampering, peer-to-peer interconnection, and easy traceability. It builds the infrastructure based on trust mechanism, so that the value of digital assets can be effectively circulated on the Internet, and the value transfer of digital assets occurs on the Internet (from a to B, rather than from a to b). Chen Jianwei, vice president of Changyou credit alliance, believes that for a long time, points belong to the marketing cost of issuing enterprises. From the perspective of penetration, points can be roughly divided into two categories: one is pure marketing activities, which has no actual value in essence, and the enterprise has not prepared corresponding exchange costs; the other is valuable points, which enterprises have prepared corresponding exchange costs – capital, goods or services. The problems of this type of points are usually denied by enterprises in the later stage, and setting thresholds to prevent users from exchanging Or clearing user points, resulting in the value of the points is far lower than the value claimed by the enterprise in the initial publicity. At the beginning of the development of blockchain technology, people from all walks of life saw the opportunity and thought that blockchain technology could solve the problem of enterprises’ repudiation and really separate the ownership of integral from enterprises to users. “But it can’t be ignored that points are still a tool for centralized enterprises to retain customers by giving back points. The blockchain makes the points unforgeable, open and transparent, and enables the points to be circulated across the issuing enterprises. To a certain extent, it goes against the original intention of centralized enterprises to issue points. The lack of motivation for issuing enterprises to reform points through the blockchain has resulted in blocks There is no breakthrough in the application of chain + integral. ” < / P > < p > there has been a long-term study on Digital Economics. Scholars believe that the behavior of Internet credit reward users has existed for many years and is very mature. The main difference between blockchain token and Internet credit is that the token is scarce and the number of issuance is limited, while the traditional Internet credit has no upper limit. However, because of the red line of fund-raising (i.e. ICO), the issuance of pass has not been legally permitted in China. “It is a very mature system to sign in and play games to gain points in the Internet era, and enterprises can decide the bonus points within their own ecology. However, if users are attracted by the way of blockchain + integral, if the problem can not be solved in practice and the logic (from traditional integral to blockchain integral) cannot be self consistent, there will be a suspicion of stealing concepts. ” < / P > < p > “if it’s not for fund-raising, there are many enterprises’ common practice that is to use the fixed marketing expenses of the original company to do blockchain integral investment, which can not only give back to users (Welfare), but also do blockchain innovative concept marketing by the way.” The scholar added. < / P > < p > a researcher in charge of a large technology company admitted that, so far, no blockchain integral application has formed a business model in China. After enterprises carry out blockchain integration based on alliance chain, they are still centralized and not decentralized, which makes blockchain technology lose its own significance. After the concept of hype, the industry and even the bystanders could not see the difference between the landing points of blockchain technology and Internet technology. “What’s more, some organizations don’t want users to spend money to buy tokens, but they are limited by national policies. Users get income by signing in and playing games. Even if the pass itself has not raised funds, it belongs to the category of investment objects. ” < / P > < p > “in essence, blockchain is a kind of closed” Internet “. It builds a credit mechanism by expanding nodes, and sacrificing efficiency for security is the essence of blockchain. The Internet has a central server, while the blockchain has no center. In the process of transmitting information, the blockchain must inform each node, so it can’t be tampered with and enhance the degree of trust and security. However, the efficiency of the blockchain is greatly reduced compared with that of the Internet. ” The person in charge added that the era of mode innovation is over, and now is the era of hard science and technology innovation. If a landing scene makes users feel that the difference between the two technologies is not big enough, it means that the technology is not hard enough.