Pinduoduo said that it had been confirmed from the consumer that the vehicle was purchased by the consumer himself and Tesla had signed an order agreement with Tesla for his own use without any intention or intention to resell the vehicle, and there was no “malicious intention” in purchasing the car. According to the activity commitment, pinduoduo and yibuyao have provided a subsidy of 20000 yuan for the consumer. For Tesla’s refusal to perform the contract with consumers, Tesla supports consumers to protect their rights according to law, and will actively implement vehicle delivery. In addition, pinduoduo also said that consumers should be treated well. When the signboard is big, we should not be arrogant, when the store is big, we should not cheat customers; if we have advanced technology, we should be calm and treat consumers’ trust actively. (He Chang) < / P > < p > this afternoon, Tesla said it had refused to deliver the model 3 to the group buying owners of pinduoduo’s “limited time and second kill” channel, and claimed that these consumers were suspected of violating Tesla’s “no resale” clause. Tesla will cancel this order unilaterally in accordance with the terms of the contract breach. < / P > < p > 1. The consumer actively informed Tesla that he had accepted pinduoduo’s subsidy. However, it is true that he / she has signed an order contract with Tesla independently, and the consumer himself / herself will place an order on Tesla’s official website and will not resell it, but will be explicitly refused to deliver by Tesla for his / her own use. However, we support consumers to protect their rights according to law and actively implement vehicle delivery. < / P > < p > in my opinion, when the signboard is big, we should not be arrogant; when the store is big, we should not cheat customers; if we have advanced technology, we should be calm and treat consumers’ trust actively.