Sina science and Technology News It was reported in the morning of August 13 that on August 7, China judicial document network disclosed a case of unfair competition dispute related to commercial defamation between Shanghai lazas Information Technology Co., Ltd., the main business entity of meituan takeout, Beijing Sankuai Online Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Sankuai Technology Co., Ltd. on July 24, Tianjin No.2 Intermediate People’s court transferred the case to Haidian District, Beijing People’s court. < p > < p > it is reported that Shanghai lazas Information Technology Co., Ltd. filed a lawsuit with Tianjin No.2 Intermediate People’s court as follows: 1. Order the two defendants to immediately stop unfair competition, including but not limited to immediately stop slandering the plaintiff’s goodwill and false publicity; 2. To order the two defendants to immediately stop unfair competition, including but not limited to all kinds of activities Third, according to the law, the two defendants were ordered to make a statement on their unfair competition behavior in the prominent position of meituan app homepage, the prominent position of meituan website (××) home page and influential newspapers nationwide for three consecutive months to eliminate the influence, and to send the general purpose of eliminating the influence in meituan takeout merchant edition for three consecutive months According to the law, the two defendants were ordered to compensate the plaintiff’s economic losses and reasonable expenses incurred in order to stop the defendant’s unfair competition behavior, totaling RMB 1 million; 5. According to Shanghai lazars Information Technology Co., Ltd., the second defendant, as the operator of meituan platform, is carrying out unfair competition behavior that infringes on the plaintiff’s legitimate rights and interests, and the second defendant is carrying out unfair competition behavior that infringes on the plaintiff’s legitimate rights and interests and destroys the market competition order. According to the merchant’s reflection, the two defendants are pushing the information of slandering the platform to the merchants through meituan platform, as well as threatening the merchants not to cooperate with the company, but to cooperate exclusively with meituan.